· 10/11/2005
Karch v. Karch
Citations
- 885 A.2d 535
- 2005 Pa. Super. 342
- 2005 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3570
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Conflicting evidence is generally insufficient to overturn the superior court, and we will not reweigh evidence when the record provides clear support for the superior court’s ruling.”
- explaining operation of “bursting bubble” presumption framework
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gantman, Stevens, Todd
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.