Skip to main content
· 10/11/2005

Karch v. Karch

Citations

  • 885 A.2d 535
  • 2005 Pa. Super. 342
  • 2005 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3570

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Conflicting evidence is generally insufficient to overturn the superior court, and we will not reweigh evidence when the record provides clear support for the superior court’s ruling.”
  • explaining operation of “bursting bubble” presumption framework

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gantman, Stevens, Todd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.