Karaha Bodas Co. v. Perusahaan Pertambangan Minyak Dan Gas Bumi Negara

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming an injunction against Indonesia, which had attempted to challenge the factual validity of a Swiss arbitral award confirmed in federal courts through litigation in the Cayman Islands
• affirming an injunction against Indonesia, which had attempted to challenge the factual validity of a Swiss arbitral award confirmed in federal courts through litigation in the Cayman Islands
• modifying injunction “slightly” on appeal to the extent agreed upon by the parties
• “[W]e conclude that the District Court retained—and retains—continuing jurisdiction to maintain the anti-foreign- suit injunction even though the federal judgments against Pertamina have been satisfied.”
• “Under the Convention, a jurisdiction may decline to enforce a foreign arbitral award if it has ‘been set aside or suspended by a competent authority of the country in which, or under the law of which, that award was made.’ ” (quoting N.Y. Convention art. V(l)(e))
• parallel litigation initiated in Cayman Islands

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).