Kar v. Rumsfeld

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the interests considered in Hamdi “strike a different balance” — more deferential to the government — in a case in which the detention occurred in the midst of a foreign war zone
• finding that the “Fourth and Fifth Amendments certainly protect U.S. citizens detained in the course of hostilities in Iraq”
• finding that the “Fourth and Fifth Amendments certainly protect U.S. citizens detained in the course of hostilities in Iraq”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).