Skip to main content
· 7/1/1871

Kapp v. Teel

Citations

  • 33 Tex. 811

Syllabus

<p>1. The rulings in Iglehart v. Moore (21 Texas, 501,) and other eases, approved, to the effect that while a negotiable instrument is current, the maker of it cannot be charged in garnishment.</p> <p>2. Injunction will lie to stay execution of a judgment rendered by a justice of the peace against a garnishee, on the answer of the latter that he had executed for his indebtedness a negotiable note which was not yet due; and it was error to dissolve the injunction for want of equity in a petition setting up such facts. The justice of the peace had no authority to render judgmeut. against a garnishee who answered to the effect stated, and without further proceedings or proof.</p>

Judges: Len

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.