Skip to main content
· 12/13/2006

Kapllaj v. Gonzales

Citations

  • 210 F. App'x 42

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[a]n expert opinion is properly 10 excluded where it relies on an assumption that is unsupported by evidence in the record 11 and is not sufficiently founded on facts”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cabranes, Hall, Hon, Leval

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.