Kaplan v. U.S. Bank, N.A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding lack of privity did not bar suit against defendant who dumped contaminated soil on the plaintiff's property because the defendant agreed to properly dispose of contaminated materials only at permitted landfills or on the defendant's property
• § 324A embodies \one of the [well recognized] exceptions to the privity rule\
• “[Tjhere must be a judicial determination that the conduct was so egregious that it was ‘tantamount to intentional wrongdoing’ and such that injury is the ‘natural and probable consequence’ of the conduct.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).