Kaplan v. Skoloff & Wolfe, PC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that trial court properly excluded expert report in legal malpractice action where expert failed to reference any evidential support of duty of care
• holding that trial court properly excluded expert report in legal malpractice action where expert failed to reference any evidential support of duty of care
• holding that trial court properly excluded an expert report in a legal malpractice action where the expert failed to reference any evidential support of duty of care
• holding that attorney's opinion of the reasonableness of a divorce settlement was an inadmissible net opinion because the attorney failed to offer any evidential support for his conclusion other than his personal view and experience
• finding that in a legal malpractice action based on an insufficient-settlement theory, expert testimony is required to establish the value of the claim
• finding summary judgment appropriate where net opinion by expert failed to establish a standard by which to judge the defendant's conduct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).