Kaplan v. Saint Peter's Healthcare System

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that when defendants failed to argue an “open question” on a motion to dismiss, “there is no basis” for dismissing the claim
• noting that the RICO wire fraud scheme “need not otherwise be prohibited by state or federal law, nor need it fit traditional common law concepts of fraud”
• dismissing trespass claim alleging that defendants engaged in \vexatious litigation\ that damaged plaintiff's reputation and pocketbook
• dismissing unjust enrichment claim based on alleged improper securing of a judgment because the judgment alone did not constitute a transfer of property
• granting a preliminary injunction based on likelihood of success of RICO claim
• finding unjust-enrichment claim “premature at best” where enrichment had not yet occurred

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).