Skip to main content
· 7/15/1991

Kaplan v. Herbstein

Citations

  • 175 A.D.2d 200

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the petitioner’s admission established his alienage, and he failed to meet his burden to establish the time, place, and manner of his entry into the United States
  • “the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure are not applicable in [removal] proceedings”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.