· 1/13/1961
Kaplan v. Flemming
Citations
- 190 F. Supp. 526
- 1961 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3535
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that the plaintiffs alleged that the defendant failed to \disclose certain dangers associated with\ defendant's dog treats, and that the plaintiffs sought to recover for the physical harms suffered by their dogs as a result of the defendant's failure to disclose these risks
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bartels
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.