Skip to main content
· 1/13/1961

Kaplan v. Flemming

Citations

  • 190 F. Supp. 526
  • 1961 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3535

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the plaintiffs alleged that the defendant failed to \disclose certain dangers associated with\ defendant's dog treats, and that the plaintiffs sought to recover for the physical harms suffered by their dogs as a result of the defendant's failure to disclose these risks

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bartels

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.