Kaplan v. Boudreaux

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an undivided interest is an undivided interest in the whole, and when that whole changes, that interest, if not the percent, also changes
• holding that an undivided interest is an undivided interest in the whole, and when that whole changes, that interest, if not the percent, also changes
• holding that an amendment to the .bylaws providing for an exclusive use easement was invalid for failure to obtain unanimous consent of the unit owners
• holding that absent unanimous consent of all unit owners, condominium association could not grant exclusive use and control of common element-sidewalk-to one unit owner because transfer of interest \reduced [the plaintiff's] percentage interest in the common property\
• interpreting identical language in G.L.c. 183A, §5(b) as amended by St. 1987, c. 87
• noting that “condominiums are essentially creatures of statute”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).