Kaplan v. Bayer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that when faced with an inconsistency between contractual provisions, a court should interpret the contract so as to reconcile the conflicting provisions
• reversing the trial court’s award of attorney’s fees pursuant to a prevailing party attorney’s fees provision contained in a purchase agreement where (i) the purchase agreement was referenced by, but not expressly incorporated into, the parties’ subsequent deed agreement, and (ii
• “Because interpretation of a contract is a question of law, we apply a de novo standard of review”
• “Because interpretation of a contract is a question of law, we apply a de novo standard of review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).