Kapiolani Estate, Ltd. v. Territory of Hawaii

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Noting that the BVA decision must consist of “a written statement of [its] findings and conclusions” and the reasons or bases for those findings “[i]n order to enable a VA claimant to understand a decision and the reasons behind it.”
• instructing Board on remand to consider potentially applicable regulations which it failed to cite or discuss
• instructing Board on remand to consider potentially applicable regulations which it failed to cite or discuss
• among reasons or bases for decision, Board must include precise basis, response to appellant’s arguments, and analysis of credibility or probative value of evidence
• in claims for restoration, the central question is not whether the schedular criteria for a particular rating are met as in a claim for increase, but whether the criteria for reduction were met
• “This is a rating reduction case, not a rating increase case”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).