Kaopua v. Holt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Court “may take judicial notice of facts not subject to reasonable dispute”
• holding that the Court \may take judicial notice of facts not subject to reasonable dispute\
• holding that “[cjourts may take judicial notice of facts not subject to reasonable dispute”
• holding that Board is required to determine credibility of sworn testimony
• stating that “[credibility is determined by the fact finder” and that “the Court cannot determine the credibility of a veteran’s sworn testimony”
• finding that “Courts may take judicial notice of facts not subject to reasonable dispute” (citing Fed. R.Evid. 201(b) (1990))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).