Kao v. Lauredo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that only “[a]ffirmative testimony of a 3 sudden and unexpected stop . . . is sufficient evidence to rebut the presumption” of negligence (quoting Liriano v. Gonzalez, 605 So. 2d 575, 576 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992))
• plaintiff’s sudden stop was reasonably expected “on a heavily congested city street during rush hour in stop and go traffic”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).