Kantor v. Kantor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying an abuse of discretion standard of review to an order awarding attorney fees and costs
• applying initial pleading requirements when reviewing denial of posttrial, presentencing motion for ineffective assistance of counsel
• applying an abuse of discretion standard of review to an order awarding attorney fees and costs
• affirming a district court's denial of appellant's motion to amend her complaint because granting the motion would require respondent to obtain new counsel, the motion to amend was SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0
• affirming a district court's denial of appellant's motion to amend her complaint because granting the motion would require respondent to obtain new counsel, the motion to amend was SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0
• reviewing the denial of a motion to amend for an abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).