Supreme Court of Florida· 9/15/1953
Kanter v. Safran
Citations
- 68 So. 2d 553
- 1953 Fla. LEXIS 1766
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- distinguishing between surrender of leasehold premises and surrender of leasehold estate
- “[S]urrender by operation of law will not be implied where such was manifestly not the intent of the parties.”
- “The fact that the landlord enters and cares for the premises after the tenant’s abandonment is not regarded as showing a resumption of exclusive possession, effecting a surrender, nor does the making of repairs in itself have that effect.”
- “[W]hether the possession taken by [landlord] is of an exclusive character, with the apparent intention of occupying and controlling the premises as his own, to the exclusion of the tenant, in case the latter desires to return . . . is ordinarily a question of fact.”
- text on p. 558 of 68 So.2d
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Roberts
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Vareka Investments, N v. a Netherlands Antilles Corp. v. American Investment Properties, Inc., a Florida Corp.Eleventh Circuit· 1984-03-21· cited 59×
- Lefemine v. BaronSupreme Court of Florida· 1991-01-03· cited 57×
- Wieczoreck v. H & H BUILDERS, INC.Supreme Court of Florida· 1985-08-30· cited 41×
- Jimmy Hall's Morningside v. Blackburn & Peck Enter.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1970-05-15· cited 26×
- Ruotal Corp., NW, Inc. v. OttatiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-12-10· cited 22×
- Orange State Oil Company v. Jacksonville Expressway AuthorityDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1962-07-12· cited 19×
- Making Ends Meet, Inc. v. CusickDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-09-02· cited 16×
- Hudson Pest Control v. Westford Asset Mgt.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-07-30· cited 14×
- Miller v. WellerThird Circuit· 1961-03-14· cited 11×
- Wolf v. BuchmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-01-18· cited 10×
- Brewer v. Northgate of Orlando, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1962-07-06· cited 10×
- Kanter v. SafranSupreme Court of Florida· 1958-01-10· cited 10×
- Pappas v. DeringerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1962-10-23· cited 9×
- In Re PAVCO Enterprises, Inc.M.D. Florida· 1994-08-02· cited 9×
- Katz v. KenholtzDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1962-12-11· cited 7×
- Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance v. RoyallM.D. Florida· 2008-10-28· cited 6×
- Babsdon Co. v. Thrifty Parking Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1963-02-05· cited 6×
- Kanter v. SafranSupreme Court of Florida· 1955-07-27· cited 6×
- 4-Way, Inc. v. BryanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-06-03· cited 6×
- Weeks v. Cal-Maine Foods, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court· 1987-12-16· cited 5×
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Hyman v. CohenSupreme Court of Florida· 1954-05-25· cited 94×
- Hawkinson v. JohnstonEighth Circuit· 1941-09-22· cited 41×
- Stenor, Inc. v. LesterSupreme Court of Florida· 1951-12-11· cited 41×
- O'Neal v. BainbridgeSupreme Court of Kansas· 1915-03-06· cited 27×
- Shea v. LeonisCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1938-11-15· cited 24×
- C. D. Stimson Co. v. Porter. In Re Save-Rite Drug StoresTenth Circuit· 1952-04-11· cited 17×
- Hulsey v. HarringtonCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1938-03-11· cited 17×
- Richman v. Joray Corp.Fourth Circuit· 1950-08-03· cited 14×
- Wukasch v. HooverCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1952-03-26· cited 14×
- Dorcich v. Time Oil Co.California Court of Appeal· 1951-04-23· cited 14×
- Lips v. OppSupreme Court of Kansas· 1939-12-09· cited 11×
- Christenson v. OhrmanSupreme Court of Kansas· 1945-03-10· cited 9×
Other cases named Kanter v. Safran
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.