Kante v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a particular social group cannot be circularly defined by the fact that its members have been subject to harm
• applying the social-visibility criterion by asking whether society views that group as “specifically targeted for mistreatment”
• group composed of “women subjected to rape as a method of government control” was improperly defined by the very fact that it suffers persecution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).