Kant v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that claims for “fraud” sound in tort
• stating that claims for “fraud” sound in tort
• declining to exercise jurisdiction over a fraud claim because it sounded in tort
• “[Plaintiff’s] claims for ‘conversion’ and ‘fraud’ sound in tort and this court lacks jurisdiction to hear tort claims.”
• ‘[Plaintiffs] claims for ‘conversion’ and ‘fraud’ sound in tort... .”}; Cox v. United States, 105 Fed. Cl. 213, 218 (2012
• “The plain language of the Tucker Act excludes from the Court of Federal Claims jurisdiction claims sounding in tort.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).