Kansi v. U.S. Department of Justice

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that Exemption 7(A) is not waived by disclosure from a federal law enforcement agency to a state prosecutor
• noting that the FBI had identified 14,281 pages of documents as responsive to Kasi’s FOIA request
• “The potential for interference with witnesses and highly sensitive evidence that drives the 7(A) exemption exists at least until [the] conviction is final.”
• “The potential for interference with witnesses and highly sensitive evidence that drives the 7(A) exemption exists at least until plaintiff’s conviction is final.”
• \The potential for interference with witnesses and highly sensitive evidence that drives the 7(A) exemption exists at least until [the] conviction is final.\
• “Plaintiffs case is still on appeal. The potential for interference with witnesses and highly sensitive evidence that drives the 7(A) exemption ... exists at least until plaintiffs conviction is final.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).