Skip to main content
· 8/19/1982

Kansas Power & Light Co. v. Burlington Northern Railroad

Citations

  • 544 F. Supp. 1336
  • 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17479

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • presuming knowledge of statutory and case law regarding interstate commerce because both parties did “substantial business” which was subject to federal and state regulation, including regulation under the Interstate Commerce Act
  • presuming knowledge of statutory and case law regarding interstate commerce because both parties did “substantial business” which was subject to federal and state regulation, including regulation under the Interstate Commerce Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Saffels

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.