· 12/24/1941
Kansas, O. & G. RY. Co. v. Helvering
Citations
- 124 F.2d 460
- 28 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 792
- 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 2529
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that \[i]t is fundamental that a general statutory provision may not be used to nullify or to trump a specific provision\
- stating that ”[i]t is fundamental that a general statutory provision may not be used to nullify or to trump a specific provision”
- stating that \[i]t is fundamental that a general statutory provision may not be used to nullify or to trump a specific provision\
- stating that a gen- eral statutory rule does not govern unless there is no more spe- cific rule (citing Green v. Bock Laundry Mach. Co., 490 U.S. 504, 524 (1989))
- stating that a gen- eral statutory rule does not govern unless there is no more spe- cific rule (citing Green v. Bock Laundry Mach. Co., 490 U.S. 504, 524 (1989))
- “It is fundamental that a general statutory provision may not be used to nullify or to trump a specific provision, irrespective of the priority of enactment.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Clark, Goodrich, Jones
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.