· 3/1/1975
Kansas Commission on Civil Rights v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
Citations
- 532 P.2d 1263
- 216 Kan. 306
- 1975 Kan. LEXIS 329
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- although disclosure of customer credit ratings intrusive, intrusion justified to protect state interest in investigating claim of race discrimination in granting credit
- court \vested with authority to issue such protective orders as it deems advisable to keep the information from prying eyes and to prevent its misuse\
- although disclosure of customer credit ratings intrusive, intrusion justified to protect state interest in investigating claim of race discrimination in granting credit
- court “vested with authority to issue such protective orders as it deems advisable to keep the information from prying eyes and to prevent its misuse”
- extension of credit is commonplace in merchandise sales
- extension of credit is commonplace in merchandise sales
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fontron
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.