Skip to main content
· 3/1/1975

Kansas Commission on Civil Rights v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

Citations

  • 532 P.2d 1263
  • 216 Kan. 306
  • 1975 Kan. LEXIS 329

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • although disclosure of customer credit ratings intrusive, intrusion justified to protect state interest in investigating claim of race discrimination in granting credit
  • court \vested with authority to issue such protective orders as it deems advisable to keep the information from prying eyes and to prevent its misuse\
  • although disclosure of customer credit ratings intrusive, intrusion justified to protect state interest in investigating claim of race discrimination in granting credit
  • court “vested with authority to issue such protective orders as it deems advisable to keep the information from prying eyes and to prevent its misuse”
  • extension of credit is commonplace in merchandise sales
  • extension of credit is commonplace in merchandise sales

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fontron

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.