Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. Teater

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ‘‘[n]eg- ligence of a party or [its] counsel is insufficient for purposes of § 52-212 to set aside a default judgment’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)
• ‘‘[t]he fact that the defendant chose to ignore [the legal] process, and now rues this decision, is not a basis to open . . . the judgment’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)
• ‘‘[t]he fact that the defendant chose to ignore [the legal] pro- cess, and now rues this decision, is not a basis to open . . . the judgment’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).