Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. Cagle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting “if the Rule 11 plea-taking procedure is careful and detailed, the defendant will not later be heard to contend that he swore falsely”
• noting “if the Rule 11 plea-taking procedure is careful and detailed, the defendant will not later be heard to contend that he swore falsely”
• “[P]ossession with intent to distribute is a continuing offense . . . .”
• “[I]f the Rule 11 plea taking procedure is careful and detailed, the defendant will not later be heard to contend that he swore falsely.” (citing United States v. Barrett, 514 F.2d 1241, 1243 (5th Cir. 1975) 2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).