Skip to main content
· 7/16/1999

Kansas Bd. of Regents v. Skinner

Citations

  • 987 P.2d 1096
  • 267 Kan. 808
  • 1999 Kan. LEXIS 414

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • party did not acquiesce to personal jurisdiction when she properly challenged the court's lack of personal jurisdiction in her answer, by a motion for summary judgment, and in jury instructions
  • parties cannot confer subject matter jurisdiction by consent, waiver, or estoppel
  • fact that a party has actual knowledge of the pendency and the nature of an action is not a substitute for service; notice or knowledge must come from service of process, or there must be a valid waiver
  • fact that a party has actual knowledge of the pendency and the nature of an action is not a substitute for service; notice or knowledge must come from service of process, or there must be a valid waiver

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lockett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.