Kanjorski v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that merit criteria for evaluating disciplinary suspensions “must be job-related and in some rational and logical manner touch upon competency and ability”
• holding that merit criteria for evaluating disciplinary suspensions under Section 803 of the Civil Service Act “must be job-related and in some rational and logical manner touch upon competency and ability”
• holding that merit criteria for evaluating disciplinary suspensions under Section 803 of the Civil Service Act “must be job-related and in some rational and logical manner touch upon competency and ability”
• holding workers compensation referee who had a personal bias against an attorney properly recused from all cases involving said attorney

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Fiore, Inc. v. Dept. of Labor and Ind.
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-03-14· cited 10×
• Salvati v. Berks County Board of Assistance
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-04-23· cited 8×
• In Re Platt
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2000-06-16· cited 4×
• Salvati v. Commonwealth, Department of Public Welfare, Berks County Board of Assistance
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-08-09· cited 3×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Corder v. Civil Service Commission
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1971-07-09· cited 64×
• Warwood v. Lancaster County Board of Assistance
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-11-22· cited 2×