Kanjaksha Kumar Katta v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the CPPA does not apply extraterritorially, thus the CPPA as incorporated into Article 134(3), UCMJ, does not apply extraterritorially
• concluding that the CPPA does not apply extraterritorially, thus the CPPA as incorporated into Article 134(3), UCMJ, does not apply extraterritorially
• holding that the CPPA does not have exterritorial application
• detailing significant additional steps required to obtain a conviction under clause 3, as compared with clauses 1 and 2
• CPPA does not apply to overseas receipt and possession offenses despite evidence that images flowed through computers in the United States
• disagreeing with the Ninth Circuit’s approach to this question

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).