Kanhukamwe v. Mukasey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the plaintiff \sufficiently pled that she was a joint employee\ of two employers and the \[d]efendant's factual assertions do not establish the contrary as a matter of law\
• finding that the plaintiff “sufficiently pled that she was a joint employee” of two employers and the “[d]efendant’s factual assertions do not establish the contrary as a matter of law”
• finding a genuine issue of fact as to whether the defendants jointly employed the plaintiff and declining to resolve the issue on a motion to dismiss
• discussing the \joint employer\ standards applied in NLRB v. Browning-Ferris Indus. of Penn., Inc., 691 F.2d 1117 (3d Cir. 1982), and Spirides v. Reinhardt, 613 F.2d 826 (D.C. Cir. 1979)
• in applying Browning-Ferris test, concluding that “supervision and evaluation [of employee performance] are [not] determinative of the joint employment question”
• in applying Browning-Ferris test, concluding that \supervision and evaluation [of employee performance] are [not] determinative of the joint employment question\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).