Kane v. RD Werner Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• agreeing that “a plaintiff who does not read an allegedly - inadequate warning cannot maintain a negligent-failure-to-warn action unless the nature of the alleged inadequacy is such that it prevents him from reading it”
• holding proximate cause is necessary under negligent failure to warn claim
• plaintiff who did not read allegedly inadequate warning cannot maintain a product liability action based on negligent failure to warn, unless nature of inadequacy is that it prevented him from reading the warnings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Solis v. BASF Corp.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2012-10-04· cited 21×
• Elam v. Lincoln Electric Co.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2005-12-20· cited 12×
• Adames v. Sheahan
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2007-11-29· cited 9×
• Murray v. Chicago Youth Center
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2004-04-16· cited 7×
• Underhill v. Coleman Co.
  S.D. Illinois· 2014-06-24

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Spruill v. Boyle-Midway, Inc.
  Fourth Circuit· 1962-09-08· cited 92×
• McCullough v. Gallaher & Speck
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1993-09-29· cited 53×
• ER Squibb & Sons, Inc. v. Cox
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1985-10-04· cited 51×
• Hubbard-Hall Chemical Company v. Charles L. Silverman, Administrator
  First Circuit· 1965-01-25· cited 45×
• Stanley Industries, Inc. v. WM Barr & Co., Inc.
  S.D. Florida· 1992-02-11· cited 20×