Kane v. Prentice

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• requiring liberal construction of the Election Code to protect a candidate’s right to run for office and voters’ rights to elect the candidate of their choice
• requiring liberal construction of the Election Code to protect a candidate's right to run for office and voters' rights to elect the candidate of their choice
• holding defect in notarization of circulator’s affidavit was amendable
• “The Election Code must be liberally construed so as not to deprive an individual of his right to run for office, or the voters of their right to elect a candidate of their choice”
• “The Election Code must be liberally construed so as not to deprive an individual of his right to run for office, or the voters of their right to elect a candidate of their choice.”
• seminal case holding that “Election Code must be liberally construed so as not to deprive an individual of his right to run for office, or the voters of their right to elect a candidate of their choice.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).