Skip to main content
· 7/26/1907

Kane v. Jones

Citations

  • 46 Wash. 631
  • 91 P. 2
  • 1907 Wash. LEXIS 676

Syllabus

<p>Appeal — Review—Findings. Findings will not be disturbed on appeal where they are amply sustained by the evidence.</p> <p>Vendor and Purchaser — Contract op Sale — Performance—Forfeiture. Where a contract of purchase required the- vendee to examine the abstract within five days, and if not acceptable, to notify the vendor of the defects, wh!o was to have thirty days to cure the same, with the right to declare a forfeiture for nonperformance, a vendee who accepted the title and went into possession, and made no objection for tweny-three days, and then, upon a further installment falling due, gave notice that the title was defective and demanded return of his money without ashing that the defects be cured, cannot recover installments paid after the same.were declared forfeited by the vendee.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • extending application of a parking ordinance to automobiles even though it only listed “hackney carriages, carts, omnibuses, wagons, and drays” because the ordinance evidenced an intent to regulate all the then-known classes of vehicles using the streets

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hadley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.