Skip to main content
· 5/10/2000

Kane v. Inhabitants of Harpswell (In Re Kane)

Citations

  • 248 B.R. 216
  • 2000 Bankr. LEXIS 540
  • 36 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 19
  • 2000 WL 622284

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that creditor’s notice of foreclosure was perfection of lien in violation of automatic stay and therefore void
  • Court held that regardless of the procedural requirements imposed by Maine statutes concerning notice of a tax lien mortgage, the end effect resulted in a violation of the automatic stay
  • “courts have often treated [installment land sales contracts] as secured debts”
  • “[Wjhatever procedural requirements are imposed by Maine statutes, the effect of the Notice was perfection of a lien against property of the estate which arose before the commencement of the case, and hence violated the automatic stay.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kenner, Hillman, Feeney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.