Kane v. Garcia Espitia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that federal habeas relief is unavailable based on the denial of expert funding to a self-represented defendant
• noting that access to a prison law library may derive from the Sixth Amendment right to counsel
• finding that absent a Supreme Court case establishing a particular right, federal court inference of such a right is not a basis upon which to grant federal habeas relief
• reversing grant of habeas relief where right at issue was not clearly established in Supreme Court precedent
• finding that a defendant who elected to proceed pro se on state court charges did not have a viable habeas corpus claim on the basis that he was denied access to a law library during pretrial confinement
• reversing grant of habeas relief where right at issue was not clearly established in Supreme Court precedent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).