Kane v. Forbes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the fraud and stock sale must be \more than some tangential relation\
• holding that the fraud and stock sale must be “more than some tangential relation”
• recognizing that SLUSA provides for removal but explaining the basis for federal sub- ject matter jurisdiction as SLUSA’s complete preemption of state claims
• holding that “[t]he claim that defendant concealed the impending accounting write-off sufficiently alleges fraud ‘in connection with’ a contract to sell Imation shares because it involves a misrepresentation about the value of the options”
• holding that “[t]he claim that defendant concealed the impending accounting write-off sufficiently alleges fraud ‘in connection with’ a contract to sell Imation shares because it involves a misrepresentation about the value of the options”
• allowing the removal of an entire ease where some but not all of the plaintiffs claims were precluded by SLUSA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).