Kane v. Field

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating with regard to a failure to challenge a trial court’s section 2511(a) determination that the “Superior Court may not, with limited exceptions for jurisdictional issues, sua sponte address issues not raised by parties”
• affirming the orders terminating the appellant’s parental rights to two of her children, and changing the permanency goals of two of - 14 - J-S06017-16 the appellant’s other children to permanent legal custody, based on the unique circumstances of each child

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).