Kane v. Doctors Hospital

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• framing the issue as whether the patient was aware that a doctor was an independent physician at the time the patient underwent a CT scan and finding that bills issued after the CT scan did “not demonstrate the extent of [the patient’s] knowledge at the time the services were rendered”
• mere silence by a hospital as to a doctor’s employment status “is sufficient for liability to attach”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).