Skip to main content
· 1/15/1883

Kane v. Cortesy

Citations

  • 36 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 206

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • expanding law to permit medical testimony regarding the cause of the injury
  • “distinct break in the continuity during which time the decedent had seen a number of people, to whom he did not mention anything about the accident” made statement inadmissible

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.