Kane v. Cameron International Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that private-nuisance claim can result from sufficiently extreme invasion or “by using property in a way that causes reasonable fear in those who own, lease, or occupy property nearby”
• affirming summary judgment against plaintiff because plaintiff’s nuisance claim was based solely on allegation of physical invasion of plaintiff’s property and plaintiff had no evidence of that claim, even though nuisance claims also can be based on other non-invasive acts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).