Kandel v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the unjustified failure of an attorney to appear in court on time is direct contempt
• finding that an attorney’s due process rights were not violated where he was summarily held in contempt, but was given an opportunity to present reasons for his tardiness
• conviction of attorney for direct criminal contempt upheld where compliance with Rule P 3 b. was belated but nonetheless accomplished
• attorney held in direct contempt for being late to court was not denied due process where record disclosed he was given the opportunity to present exculpatory reasons for his tardiness
• attorney held in direct contempt for being late to court was not denied due process where record disclosed he was given the opportunity to present exculpatory reasons for his tardiness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).