Kandel v. FN Taxi Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The district court may make findings of fact [regarding the nature of a prior conviction] based on undisputed statements in the PSI . . . .”
• “A defendant makes a proper objection when he identifies the specific PSI paragraphs to which he objects and states the reason for his objection . . . .”
• “The Shepard documents in this case include … undisputed statements in the PSI.”
• ex- plaining, in a case concerning the Armed Career Criminal Act, that a defendant’s failure to object to a particular PSI paragraph “makes those facts undisputed and available to the Government, despite the express incorporation of a non-Shepard source”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).