Kancar v. New York

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the “filing of an EEOC charge and a civil rights lawsuit are activities protected by the first amendment”
• directing inquiry to degree of local autonomy and control and whether suit will draw payment from the state treasury
• content of speech not analyzed; filing of EEOC charge automatically protected by First Amendment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).