Kampfe v. J. R. Torrey Razor Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a party may not use Rule 45 to circumvent a requirement of Rule 34, and concluding that “[i]t is unthinkable that the effect of Rule 34 can be emasculated by the use of Rule 45”
• discussing older version of the relevant federal rules

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).