Kampen v. American Isuzu Motors, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the court’s authority under Rule 26(b)(1) to deny discovery requests which “amount to nothing more than a fishing expedition”
• declining to compel discovery of police officer’s home address under the official information privilege applicable in federal civil rights cases
• “[C]ourts should not grant discovery requests based on pure speculation that amount to nothing more than a fishing expedition . . . .”
• “courts should not grant discovery requests based on pure speculation that amount to nothing more than a ‘fishing expedition’...”
• “[C]ourts should not grant discovery requests based on pure speculation that amount to nothing more than a fishing expedition....”
• “[C]ourts should not grant discovery requests based on pure speculation that amount to nothing more than a fishing expedition.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).