Kamman v. Seabolt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• having made requisite finding of unavailability, trial court did not err in allowing physician’s deposition to be read into evidence where appellant stipulated that deposition was “being taken for the purpose of discovery and for all other purposes allowed by law”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).