Ninth Circuit· 6/15/2009
Kamm v. ITEX CORP.
Citations
- 568 F.3d 752
- 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 12709
- 2009 WL 1651542
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that “remands based on abstention ... are not covered by § 1447(c),” analogizing remand motion based on forum selection clause to abstention-based motion, and holding that the 30-day limit did not apply
- explaining 10 that while a forum selection clause “does not render removal ‘defective’” under 1447(c
- collecting cases deciding forum-selection clauses are not defects under § 1447(c)
- “It is relatively clear from context that ‘defect’ 17 refers to a failure to comply with the statutory requirements for removal provided in 28 U.S.C. §§ 18 1441–1453.”
- “[A] forum selection clause is not a defect within the meaning of § 1447(c) and [] the thirty-day statutory time limit does not apply to a motion to remand based on a forum selection clause.”
- “venue shall be in the courts of the State of Oregon”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fletcher, Fisher, Breyer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- City of Albuquerque v. Soto Enterprises, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 2017-07-25· cited 136×
- FindWhere Holdings, Inc. v. Systems Environment Optimization, LLCFourth Circuit· 2010-11-29· cited 66×
- Atlantic National Trust LLC v. Mt. Hawley InsuranceNinth Circuit· 2010-09-02· cited 58×
- Graphic Communications Local 1B Health & Welfare Fund \A\ v. CVS Caremark Corp.Eighth Circuit· 2011-03-11· cited 54×
- Grace Ranch v. BP American ProductionFifth Circuit· 2021-02-24· cited 27×
- Bynum v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.Fourth Circuit· 2014-06-23· cited 20×
- Garza v. Brinderson Constructors, Inc.N.D. California· 2016-04-04· cited 19×
- Silving v. Wells Fargo Bank, NaD. Arizona· 2011-07-07· cited 13×
- Carmen Group, Inc. v. Xavier UniversityD.C. Circuit· 2014-05-05· cited 5×
- Middendorf v. West Chester Hospital, LLCS.D. Ohio· 2017-02-08· cited 5×
- Durham v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaC.D. California· 2017-02-15· cited 5×
- Medical Associates of Erie v. Michael ZaycoskyThird Circuit· 2023-08-09· cited 5×
- Abraham Watkins v. FesterygaFifth Circuit· 2025-05-16· cited 5×
- Myers v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Miss., Ins. Co.S.D. Mississippi· 2019-02-21· cited 2×
- Wood v. Igate Technologies, Inc.N.D. California· 2015-04-22· cited 1×
- McCann v. West Chester Hospital, LLCS.D. Ohio· 2017-02-08· cited 1×
- Carmen Group Incorporated v. Xavier University of LouisianaDistrict of Columbia· 2014-05-05
- Graphic Communications v. CVS Caremark CorporationEighth Circuit· 2011-03-11
- James Watson v. City of Allen, TexasFifth Circuit· 2016-05-05
- Grace Ranch v. BP American ProductionFifth Circuit· 2021-02-26
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court· 1971-02-23· cited 14,568×
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court· 1988-01-20· cited 9,468×
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court· 1972-06-12· cited 3,455×
- Quackenbush v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court· 1996-06-10· cited 2,158×
- Thermtron Products, Inc. v. HermansdorferSupreme Court· 1976-01-21· cited 1,066×
- Kircher v. Putnam Funds TrustSupreme Court· 2006-06-15· cited 305×
- Emma C. Lively v. Wild Oats Markets, Inc., a Delaware CorporationNinth Circuit· 2006-07-27· cited 262×
- Pelleport Investors, Inc. v. Budco Quality Theatres, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1984-08-24· cited 241×
- Foster v. Chesapeake Insurance CompanyThird Circuit· 1991-05-20· cited 237×
- Snapper, Inc. v. RedanEleventh Circuit· 1999-04-05· cited 150×
- American Soda, LLP v. U.S. Filter Wastewater Group, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 2005-11-07· cited 106×
- Vasquez v. North County Transit DistrictNinth Circuit· 2002-06-11· cited 80×
- Autoridad De Energ a Electrica De Puerto Rico v. Ericsson Inc., F/k/a Ericsson Ge Mobile Communications Inc. Federal Insurance Company John DoeFirst Circuit· 2000-01-06· cited 56×
- Tahara v. Matson Terminals, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2007-12-27· cited 51×
- Deborah Cook v. Gerald Wikler John Palko, John Palko, Defendant/third Party v. Tonkinson, P.O., Badge No. 708, Third Party Police Officer TonkinsonThird Circuit· 2003-02-24· cited 34×
- Unnamed caseNinth Circuit· 1991-08-08· cited 28×
- Schmitt v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaNinth Circuit· 1988-05-06· cited 25×
- Shannon Cruthis v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanySeventh Circuit· 2004-02-02· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.