Kaminsky v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a defendant’s stipulation that he qualifies for treatment as a habitual offender does not prevent him from arguing by means of a rule 3.850 motion that, in fact, his record does not so qualify him

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Miller v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-12-06
• Williams v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-03-14

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Larson v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1991-01-03· cited 90×