Kaminski v. Newton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “At common law, where the conduct of two or more actors proximately causes a single injury to a plaintiff, while the plaintiff may pursue compensation for the injury from any or all of the defendants, the plaintiff is entitled to only one satisfaction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hanley v. Mazda Motor Corp.
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2000-04-19· cited 28×
• Teodorescu v. Bushnell, Gage, Reizen & Byington
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1993-08-17· cited 26×
• Velez v. Tuma
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2009-04-16· cited 11×
• Vermilya v. Carter Crompton Site Development Contractors, Inc
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1993-09-08· cited 7×
• Grand Blanc Cement Products, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of North America
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1997-08-19· cited 6×
• Peacock v. Landquest Ltd.
  Sixth Circuit· 1995-04-10
• Grand Blanc Cement v. INA
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1997-11-06
• Teodorescu v. B, G, R & B
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1993-08-17

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Maddux v. Donaldson
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1961-02-28· cited 92×
• Sexton v. American Aggregates
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1975-04-24· cited 15×
• Sobotta v. Vogel
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1971-11-22· cited 13×
• Belin v. Jax Kar Wash No 5, Inc
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1980-02-20· cited 9×