Kamikawa v. Keskinen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• construing insurance policy which explicitly stated that coverage was effective “ ‘upon receipt of the premium at the company’s home office and not at the time of mailing’ ” to require delivery of payment at insurance company’s home office
• an enforceable contract has three elements: an offer, an acceptance, and consideration

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Apple, Inc. v. Motorola Mobility, Inc.
  W.D. Wisconsin· 2012-08-10· cited 14×
• Peninsular Life Insurance Company v. Hanratty
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1973-08-20· cited 8×
• Carroll v. Stryker Corp.
  W.D. Wisconsin· 2009-11-20· cited 8×
• Dalton Buick, Oldsmobile, Pontiac, Cadillac, Inc. v. Universal Underwriters Insurance
  Nebraska Court of Appeals· 1993-08-03· cited 1×