Kamerman v. Steinberg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “New York law . . . establishes the following elements of economic duress: (1) a threat, (2) which was unlawfully made, and (3) caused involuntary acceptance of contract terms, (4) because the circumstances permitted no other alternative.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Paul A. Bilzerian
  Second Circuit· 1991-01-03· cited 610×
• Road Sprinkler Fitters Local Union, A/K/A United Association of Journeymen, Afl-Cio v. Continental Sprinkler Company, Universal Sprinkler Corporation
  Fifth Circuit· 1992-07-28· cited 44×
• Teachers Insurance & Annuity Ass'n of America v. Wometco Enterprises, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 1993-09-22· cited 32×
• Kamerman v. Steinberg
  Second Circuit· 1989-12-06· cited 27×
• Manela v. Garantia Banking Ltd.
  S.D. New York· 1998-05-07· cited 25×
• United States v. Twenty Miljam-350 IED Jammers
  Second Circuit· 2011-12-22· cited 24×
• Sudul v. Computer Outsourcing Services, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 1996-03-10· cited 16×
• Feeley v. Whitman Corp.
  S.D. New York· 1999-09-01· cited 13×
• CSX Corp. v. Children's Investment Fund Management (UK) LLP
  S.D. New York· 2008-06-11· cited 12×
• Quinio v. Aala
  E.D. New York· 2018-09-25· cited 11×
• Zipper v. Sun Co., Inc.
  E.D. New York· 1996-11-05· cited 6×
• Bagdan v. Beck
  D. New Jersey· 1991-09-19· cited 6×
• Rivera v. Sovereign Bank
  E.D. New York· 2013-09-30· cited 4×
• Duraflex Sales & Service Corporation v. W.H.E. Mechanical Contractors
  First Circuit· 1997-04-03